skip header and navigation
HHS Home  Bureau of Health Professions Questions? Search
HRSA Home
Photos of Health Professions
HRSA Home
Grants
Student Assistance
National Health Service Corps
National Center for Health Workforce Analysis
Health Professional Shortage Areas
Medicine & Dentistry - Medicine & Dentistry
Medicine & Dentistry
Nursing
Diversity
Area Health Education Center
Public Health
Other Disciplines
Children Hospitals GME
Practioner Data Banks
Practioner Data Banks

 

National Center for Health Workforce Analysis
Home | Reports | Databases | Regional Centers | Grants | Shortage Designation | About Us

Reports > State Responses to Health Worker Shortages: Results of 2002 Survey of States > Discussion

  • For the most part, states have become involved in addressing health worker shortages not because of their roles in financing and regulation of health and education, which are extensive, but in response to general concerns with the impact on access and quality. Although the health and education sectors have a major stake in the health workforce and they have undertaken many efforts to address shortages, their actions alone have not been successful in preventing or reversing the shortages. Given the failure of the marketplace and the health and education sectors to produce a supply of health workers to meet the demand, the public has turned to state government to provide leadership. States clearly have a major role to play in addressing health worker shortages.
  • For the most part, the state responses to date have been relatively modest and narrowly focused. The responses have generally been designed to stimulate the production of new workers, such as through scholarships, loan repayment, and the marketing of health careers. States have also provided some additional reimbursement, particularly through the Medicaid program for long term care paraprofessionals.
  • With few exceptions, states do not appear to be addressing problems of retention or trying to improve productivity. This likely reflects the difficulty for government to influence internal health facility operations. States do not appear to be seeking to change licensure or scope of practice regulations, which is also a sensitive area to most professions.
  • Although there is some inevitable duplication and redundancy in having each state explore and develop their own policy responses, there appear to be major benefits to the processes states are going through. This includes development of solutions and programs consistent with each state's health and education systems and increased collaboration between the health and education sectors and between labor and management which can foster effective policy development and implementation. The development of individual state policies also fosters innovation and creativity.
  • In light of the significant amount of activity at the state level, the early stage of development, and the need for continued attention to health workforce issues by states, there would appear to be major benefits to collaboration and information sharing among states. A major investment in the evaluation of the impact and effectiveness of the alternative policies and strategies would also seem to be appropriate and very valuable. The federal government and foundations could play an important role in collecting and disseminating information across states and in supporting evaluations of responses to workforce shortages.
  • Responding to health worker shortages is an opportunity to address other important issues, including the quality of care, the lack of diversity in many professions, and the quality of life for many workers. Overworked and frustrated workers contribute to errors and poor outcomes. Increasing worker satisfaction, using technology to assist workers and patients, and re-designing jobs and tasks to reduce burnout and errors will not only increase retention but also improve quality of care and the quality of lives of workers. Building career ladders will help diversify the workforce and address the current inequities.
    The marketplace for health workers is often slow and inefficient, but it does respond. For example, in response to the publicity around nursing shortages, enrollment in nursing programs is rising, and health facilities are developing initiatives to increase retention. Thus, it is likely that some of the health worker shortages will subside in the next few years as the marketplace responds. While this is good news, the demographics of America will make it very difficult to increase the supply in future years when the demand is likely to rise rapidly as the baby boom generation ages. For this reason, it is critical that the assessment of health workforce needs and the development of systems to address health workforce needs not be viewed as temporary issues but as long range issues that will require continuing attention and policy making structures to assure an adequate supply of health workers.

 

 


HRSA | HHS | Privacy Policy | Disclaimers | Accessibility |
Clinician Recruitment & Service | Health Professions | Healthcare Systems | HIV/AIDS | Maternal and Child Health | Primary Health Care | Rural Health |
Instructions for Downloading Viewers and Players