Skip Navigation HRSA - U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Service Administration U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Home
Questions
Order Publications
 
Grants Find Help Service Delivery Data Health Care Concerns About HRSA

National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice: First Report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Congress

 

III. NACNEP’s View of the Current State of Nursing

Today’s registered nurse practices in a far more complex environment than in the past brought about by continuing changes in delivery of health care; rapid advances in technology, drug therapy, and equipment; increasing number of older adults with multiple chronic conditions, and expanding diversity of the country’s residents. The development of myriad community-based settings as sites for delivery of health care requires a more autonomous practicing nurse with higher levels of professional knowledge and judgment and an expanded set of skills. This changing environment for nursing practice raises a multiplicity of workforce, education and conditions of practice issues.

Workforce

Slower growth rate of RN workforce. The National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses (NSSRN), a periodic study carried out by the Division of Nursing, BHPr, HRSA estimates that there were 2,696,540 RNs with current licenses to practice in March 2000, an increase of 5.4 percent over the 2,558,874 in March 1996. Although these data demonstrate continuing growth in the number of RNs the increase shown in this four-year period is less than that shown in all of the prior studies, and markedly less than the 14.2 percent increase experienced between 1992 and 1996.

RN workforce becoming older. The “aging of the nursing profession” and its impact on the availability of nurses is the subject of numerous recent journal articles. RNs are older today, on average, than they have ever been. The increasing age level of the RN population is well documented in the NSSRN March 2000 study. The average age of the nurses was 45.2 years compared to an average age of 44.3 years in 1996. Sixty-eight percent of the nurses in 2000 were at least 40 years old. Only 9 percent were less than 30 years old. More RNs are approaching retirement age with fewer RNs to replace them.

A very substantial percentage, 81.7 percent, or 2,201,813 out of 2,696,540 in the RN population in 2000, was actively engaged in the variety of nursing positions throughout the health care arena. Yet, the percent working in 2000 was slightly less than that found in the studies made in the 1990s. For the first time the rate of increase of the United States population has surpassed that of the RN workforce. In 2000, the ratio of RNs to 100,000 people in the United States was 782 compared to a ratio of 798 in 1996. There were only an additional 86,000 nurses in the active workforce of 2000 over that of 1996. The RNs who were not among these actively employed nurses were mainly an older group. Thirty-six percent were at least 60 years old and an additional 23 percent were between the ages of 50 years and 59 years.

Fewer entrants into the nursing profession. The slower rate of growth and the continuing aging of the nurse workforce are accompanied by significant decreases in the numbers of entrants into and graduates from nursing education programs that prepare individuals to become registered nurses. Data from the National League for Nursing’s annual surveys highlight the continuous decline in the enrollments of all entry-level nursing education programs since the 1993-1994 academic year. In October 15, 1993, there were 270,228 students enrolled. By October 15, 1998, the start of the 1998-1999 academic year, enrollments had fallen to 211,514, a decrease of 22 percent.

Grave implications for nursing resources of the future. Barring significant changes in the flow of entrants into nursing, research suggests that the supply of RNs will start to decline within the next 10 years or so. In an article in the June 14, 2000 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association reporting on a study analyzing the implications of the aging nurse workforce for the future, the authors project that the size of the RN workforce will begin to decline in 2012. The authors state that, by 2020, the RN workforce will be 20 percent below projected requirements.

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) in a May 18, 2001 report that reviewed various studies of the supply and demand for nurses states that evidence exists of the supply in the RN labor market failing to meet demand around 2010. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the report indicates an increase of 450,864 new jobs for RNs between 1998 and 2008. It also sees a need for substantial numbers of RNs to replace those who would be retiring. The report points out that, while all industries will be faced with the need to replace workers because of the aging of the population, employers of RNs will be particularly affected because of the above-average proportion of nurses aged 45 years and older compared to other workers. The NSSRN estimates that 46 percent of the actively employed RNs in March 2000 were at least 45 years old. Only about 37 percent of a comparable part of the civilian labor force in the country was at least 45 years old in the year 2000. CRS in its report states that BLS projects that 42 percent of the total 794,000 RN job openings through 2008 could be for replacing retirees.

Increased diversity of the nation. In March 2000, only 12 percent of the RNs were estimated to be from minority backgrounds compared to an estimated 30 percent of the United States population. Research has shown that there are substantial racial and ethnic disparities in health. Although a number of factors might account for these differences, inadequate access to quality and appropriate care is of paramount importance. Nurses from minority backgrounds are significant contributors to the provision of health care services, and leaders in the development of models of care that address the unique needs of racial/ethnic minority members of the country’s population. Strategies directed toward attracting and retaining increasing numbers of racial/ethnic minorities into nursing are a prime consideration in the reduction of health care disparities.

A competitive edge. Nursing remains as an overwhelmingly female occupation. Despite recent gains in the number of men in the nurse workforce, 94 percent of the actively employed RNs in March 2000 were women. These data are troubling in the face of continually expanding opportunities for women in other occupations. An article in the September-October 2000 issue of Nursing Economics$ documents the increased interest among women in careers traditionally dominated by men. It cites as examples careers such as medicine and law that are now likely to be equally listed by men and women college freshmen. Thus, to increase, or at least maintain, interest in careers in nursing, particularly among new high school graduates, recruitment strategies to attract men as well as women are critical.

Promoting nursing as an economically attractive career is necessary for increasing its competitive standing as a career choice. Data from the periodic NSSRNs demonstrate the gains made in nursing salaries in the early 1990s. In more recent years, however, nurses’ salaries show far less gain. The average salary of full-time employed RNs in 2000 was $46,782, an increase of 24 percent since 1992. But when changes in the purchasing power are taken into account, RNs made essentially no gains between 1992 and 2000. Full-time workers in the professions of medicine, pharmacy, law, and engineering, which might be competitive career choices to nursing, averaged far more than RNs in 2000. BLS estimated that the median weekly earnings for RNs were $790 compared to $1,340 for physicians, $1,243 for pharmacists, $1,304 for lawyers, and $1,104 for engineers.

Education

Increased complexity of care demands a better educated RN. The nurse workforce of today must be prepared for the increased expectations arising out of the evolving changes in the health care environment. For currently practicing RNs, advanced and continuing education are essential to ensure their contributions to the efficacy and safety of the patient care being delivered.

The nurse role of the present and future calls for RNs to practice within a complex healthcare system, to work as peers in interdisciplinary teams and to integrate evidence-based clinical knowledge with knowledge of the diverse community and its resources. The ever increasing complexity of the RN’s scope of practice requires a workforce that has the capacity to adapt to change. It requires critical thinking, problem solving and effective communicative skills. A broad perspective and understanding of health and factors affecting health are needed to fill the RN roles in the present reconstituted health care system. All levels of RNs have an important role to play in the evolving health care system.

Baccalaureate education with its broader, more scientific base provides the sound foundation for the variety of nursing positions and for entry to advanced nursing education and practice. Majority of today’s RN population educated at less than the baccalaureate level. According to the NSSRN, in March 2000, only 43.6 percent of the nurse workforce had at least a baccalaureate degree. These data show only a 2 percent change since 1996 when 41.5 percent of the nurse workforce had at least a baccalaureate degree. In response to the emerging health care system, NACNEP set the following target in 1995:

  • Increase the overall number of baccalaureate and higher degree prepared nurses making up the basic nurse workforce to achieve 2/3 BSN-prepared nursing workforce by 2010.

To meet this target, dramatic efforts are needed for the 23 percent increase between 2000 and 2010 in the percentage of the nurse workforce with at least a baccalaureate degree.

Only 10 percent of today’s nurse workforce with graduate degrees. Graduate education at the master’s and doctoral levels provides the advanced knowledge necessary for specialized nursing and health care; managing and directing nursing in the varied complex clinical care settings, and educating the next generation of nursing students. It is from the nurse workforce with graduate education that those providing primary care as nurse practitioners and nurse midwives, and the nurse anesthetists are primarily drawn. These practitioners make substantial contributions to the care of the underserved and those in rural areas:

  • Comparisons between certified nurse practitioners and primary care physicians show that 14 percent of nurse practitioners provide primary care in high poverty areas compared to 9 percent of physicians.
  • Approximately 90 percent of certified nurse-midwives provide care to low-income women and 80 percent provide care to uninsured women.
  • Certified RN anesthetists administer approximately 65 percent of over 26 million anesthetics administered each year. They are the sole providers of anesthetics in more than 70 percent of rural area hospitals. RNs with graduate degrees also function as clinical nurse specialists to provide expert care and advice in the particular specialty area of their education. Moreover, graduate degree RNs are the nurses providing the managerial and administrative leadership that supports effective quality nursing care; the research that enhances and promotes innovation in the nursing practice and the delivery of health care, and the faculty for the nursing educational system.

Lack of availability of RNs for qualified faculty. Nursing education programs at all levels, from practical nursing education to doctoral nursing education, employed 46,655 RNs in March 2000. Preparation at least at the master’s degree level is the generally accepted appropriate qualification for teaching. For baccalaureate and graduate education, the generally accepted academic norm is the doctoral degree. Data from the NSSRN indicated that not all nursing educators meet these criteria. In March 2000, 19 percent of all the nurse educators had doctoral degrees and 45 percent had as their highest level of education, a master’s degree. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) in an April 1999 Issue Bulletin discussing faculty shortages outlines several issues regarding the availability of faculty among which was the inadequate numbers of doctorally-prepared faculty. AACN indicates that only slightly more than 50 percent of the nursing faculty in its member universities and senior colleges are doctorally-prepared. The paper also cites as issues the declines in master’s degree nursing students pursuing academic careers and the aging of the nurse faculty. Nurse educators tended to come from the older segments of the RN workforce, according to the March 2000 NSSRN. The average age of all the RNs working in nursing education programs was 49.4 years. Of significance throughout is the competition between the nursing education programs and the clinical and administrative areas of health services organizations for the relatively scarce numbers of RNs with advanced degrees.

Need to broaden sites for clinical experiences. Beyond the need to ensure that sufficient qualified faculty is available is that of the need to broaden the sites in which clinical experiences for nursing students are obtained. Clinical sites for education need to reflect the realities of community-based health services delivery prominent in our restructured health care environment. Hospital- focused clinical education does not provide the breadth and range of understanding of the practice milieu necessary for today’s practitioner. It is critically important to expand the range of clinical sites for student experiences to encompass more community-based health care settings in both initial and advanced educational programs. The growth of nurse- managed centers under the aegis of nursing education programs has proved valuable in this connection. Not only do they serve as a vehicle through which the underserved can obtain health care but also they provide students with access to working with patients in the community. It is critical that sources for stable and continuous financing be provided to these clinics to ensure their viability.

Continuing education required to update RN knowledge. Rapid changes in health care needs and treatment of health problems make continuing education essential if the quality of care is to be maintained. To a large extent, today’s nurses were educated in an era prior to the current revolution in health care. Fifty-seven percent of the RNs in March 2000 graduated from the educational program that prepared them to become nurses before 1985. Thus, the need to “keep up” with the technological advances of vastly expanding treatment modalities is coupled with the need for retraining and upgrading of skills to function in this current, continually changing, health care environment. The responsibility for providing the opportunities for RNs to maintain and enhance their professional knowledge and skills is a shared one. In addition to the responsibility of employers to provide inservice education that improves and maintains clinical skills there is a need for continuing education for practicing nurses in such areas as geriatrics, genetics/genomics, informatics, and other technological and specialty fields.

Practice Improvement

Changes in health care system affect distribution of nursing positions. Over the past years the hospital was the central focus of nursing education and much of the practice of nursing. The hospital setting still dominates as an employment site for RNs but marked changes are occurring:

  • Less than 10 years ago in March 1992, 66.5 percent of the 1.8 million employed RNs worked in hospitals. Only 59 percent of the 2.2 million employed RNs in March 2000 worked there.
  • The movement of care from the inpatient arena to an ambulatory base provides for a shifting locus for RN employment within the hospital. In 1992, 64 percent of the RNs providing direct patient care in hospitals worked in in-patient bed units. In 2000, the percentage decreased to 58 percent, as estimated from known responses to the NSSRN.
  • Between 1992 and 2000, the number of RNs employed in public and community health settings including such settings as State and local health agencies, home health agencies, community-based clinics, student health and occupational health services increased 61 percent. The number employed in ambulatory care settings, including physician, nurse, and group practices and health maintenance organizations increased 45 percent.
  • Although far less than the gains shown for the public/community health and the ambulatory care sectors, the number of RNs employed in nursing homes also increased at a higher rate than the number in hospitals, 18.5 percent compared to 5 percent. Current difficulties with filling RN positions. Increasingly, media from all parts of the country carry stories about difficulties in recruiting RNs for vacant nursing positions. In addition to reports of individual institutions and agencies’ inability to recruit RNs to fill staff vacancies, data from a number of national and State studies reveal significant shortages.

Most of the reported data focus on the difficulties hospitals have in recruiting sufficient numbers of nurses to fill their positions. A stud y carried out by the American Hospital Association in 2001 of 715 hospitals across the country revealed that 126,000 of the 168,000 positions in six job categories that were unfilled were for RNs. Seventy- five percent of the hospitals reported more difficulty in recruiting for RNs in 2001 than the previous year.

These data are reinforced by studies made in various States. According to an article in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, the Florida Hospital Association reported that a vacancy rate for RNs of 11 percent in 2000 increased to 15.6 percent in 2001. The Association for Hospitals and Health Systems in Maryland reported that the percentage of unfilled RN positions increased from 11 percent in 1999 to 13.9 percent in 2000. A study made in Oregon showed that vacancies for nurses in hospitals ranged between 10 percent and 18 percent and that high vacancy rates were also being reported for other RN employment settings.

RN dissatisfaction with employment conditions. Along with the media reports of vacant hospital nursing positions are the reports of nurse dissatisfactions with staffing levels that are insufficient for providing appropriate care to patients and mandatory overtime requirements that exacerbate the unsafe practice conditions. The General Accounting Office (GAO) in its May 17, 2001 report on recruitment and retention of nurses and nurses aides indicates that job dissatisfaction may affect the extent of the nursing shortage. GAO states that recent surveys “have found decreased job satisfaction, and a high portion of respondents have reported increased pressure to accomplish work, increased required overtime, and stress-related illness.” Based on estimates in the NSSRN for March 2000, 73 percent of the RNs in the active workforce were satisfied with their jobs. But, a lower percentage of those who were staff nurses in hospitals, 68 percent, were satisfied. The tension caused by responsibilities for sicker patients with complex conditions, and the work schedules required by the need to cover the 24- hour, seven day a week care for patients, possibly contribute to less satisfaction among hospital-employed RNs. Also, these same conditions could account for hospital-employed RNs retreating to less stressful and demanding nursing positions as variability in the types of employment sites expands.

An aging nurse workforce has implications for the work structure . The increasing age level of RNs points to the need to restructure nursing positions to accommodate to the physical needs of older individuals and the possible expectations that older workers might have for independence and more professional level interactions. The age level of the available RN workforce, in particular, affects hospitals. They are more likely than other types of nurse employment settings to draw their RN employees from the younger age cohorts, those that are predicted to be a decreasing part of the RN workforce. Data from the NSSRN for March 2000 show that the average age of the RNs working in hospitals was 41.8 years, far lower than that for RNs in ambulatory care settings, 44.3 years; public/community health settings, 45.2 years; and nursing homes, 45.3 years. Furthermore, RNs in the most stressful and labor- intensive units in the hospital tended to be younger than those in other types of units. For example, the average age of the nurses working in intensive care units was 38.7 years; those in step-down or transitional bed units averaged 38.8 years, and those in other types of bed units averaged 41.1 years. Nurses working in emergency departments had an average age of 40.4 years and those in outpatient departments, 44.5 years. Under current circumstances, it is anticipated that the aging of the nurse workforce will continue in the future, thus materially affecting the ability to recruit and retain nurses in these stressful positions. Thought has to be given to approaches to accommodate to this phenomenon in order to attract nurses to these positions and, once there, to retain them.

The ability of the present nursing workforce and the nursing education system to meet the health care challenges of today and the future is questionable. Currently, the quantity of nurses is lacking and projected to fall even further behind the societal needs engendered by the demographic aging curve of the population. NACNEP believes that the many issues outlined here about the size and the composition of the workforce; the nurse educational system and the work environment identify matters for consideration in affecting the current and future critical nursing shortages. These must be addressed to ensure the availability of the size and quality of the RN workforce necessary for the country’s health care service requirements.