Skip Navigation HRSA - U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Service Administration U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Home
Questions
Order Publications
 
Grants Find Help Service Delivery Data Health Care Concerns About HRSA

National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice: Second Report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Congress

 

II. Overview of NACNEP's Activities

NACNEP'S primary activities during the year were centered on furthering two major facets of the prior work described in the first mandated report: 1) the COGME and NACNEP joint interdisciplinary activities and 2) the issues underlying the continuing nursing shortage with special attention to the nurse faculty shortage.

Interdisciplinary Activities

Health Professions Education Summit

NACNEP, along with COGME, participated in organizing and coordinating a multidisciplinary invitational summit of leaders to discuss and develop strategies for restructuring health professions education to advance and better prepare health professionals to practice in today's health care system. The summit, which was held on June 17-18, 2002, was sponsored by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). Federal contributions in support of the summit were made by the Division of Medicine and Dentistry, and the Division of Nursing, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Private partners included the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation and the California Healthcare Foundation. Over 150 national experts in health professions education, regulation, quality, health policy, and industry participated in the summit.

The participants examined the new skills and roles health professionals need to successfully address the health needs of the population: patient-centered care, interdisciplinary teams, evidence-based practice, quality improvement and informatics. The attendees, working in small interdisciplinary groups, developed strategies around these five skill areas, which were synthesized into seven crosscutting strategies for the reform of health professions education. Once again working in small interdisciplinary groups, the participants then developed personal action steps to take over the next 1-3 year period to implement these seven strategies. Over 200 action steps were generated. These will be covered in a report to be published and distributed by IOM toward the end of 2002.

Furthering Interdisciplinary Education and Practice

The joint NACNEP and COGME recommendations described in the report Collaborative Education to Ensure Patient Safety fostered a number of cooperative agreements with public and private nonprofit entities that were cosponsored by HRSA's nursing and medicine divisions. For one of the projects resulting in a cooperative agreement, a grantee was selected to develop a national "train the trainers" program to create nurse and physician faculty leaders in interdisciplinary education specifically directed toward enhancing patient safety. Faculty graduates of this program would then lead in training other medical and nursing faculty in the curricula and techniques learned under this program. The University of Washington in Seattle received an award of $1.2 million for the 3-year project period.

The second call for applications by the two divisions was to provide awards of $300,000 each to four awardees for improving patient safety at the direct care level in hospitals and in communities through collaborative, interdisciplinary activities focusing on the planning, development, and implementation of patient safety curricula/activities, including simulations and informatics to prepare physicians and advanced practice nurses to promote safety and prevent errors in health care delivery. The four awards were made to the following institutions for the specific purposes listed:

  • University of California, San Francisco: Medical and nursing faculty and clinicians, as well as their students who complete this competency-based, web and seminar-based curriculum will learn to improve outcomes for patients with vascular access devices.
  • University of Colorado Health Science Center: This award will develop case studies for use by interdisciplinary teams of medical and nursing faculty to collaboratively teach students from both disciplines to improve care of patients in the seven State Area Health Education Center (AHEC).
  • Health Research and Educational Trust, Chicago: This award will use executive walkrounds in 10 traditional and nontraditional clinical sites to teach graduate medical and nursing students, clinicians and faculty about open discussions of adverse events (misses and near misses). The presence of executives in the rounds will ensure that the issue is heard and discussion of systems changes and implications are exchanged to promote change. The project will take place in 10 hospitals in urban and rural Massachusetts.
  • University of Mississippi, Jackson: This State-wide project is a partnership between the only school of medicine in Mississippi and the State's five graduate nursing programs that prepare advanced practice nurses. The partnership will develop, implement and evaluate a patient safety curriculum to teach to graduate medical and nursing students across the State in regional workshops and to provide the students with on-going electronic consultation.

The five cooperative agreements were awarded in September 2001 for a 3-year period. The grantees are now completing their first year of work.

The characteristically significant shared experience of each of these undertakings is the personal and professional commitment and participation of academic faculty, clinical faculty from health care settings, and administrators from both academia and the health care settings. Such involvement of both faculty and administration promises to deal with the usual "controversies" associated with interdisciplinary education, such as confusion about definitions and terms, curriculum length and content, faculty and departmental resistance, questions about university support of interdisciplinary, collaboratively taught courses, license requirements and scopes of practice.

Nursing Shortages

The Continuing RN Shortage

As NACNEP continued its work during the year to "provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary and Congress concerning policy matters arising in the administration of [Title VIII], including the range of issues relating to the nurse workforce, education, and practice improvement", it was clear that the nursing shortage had not abated. The elements identified as affecting the future supply of RNs were still relevant. Therefore, the most critical issues facing the availability of nursing care continued to be those of the nursing shortage from both short-term and long-term perspectives. Major segments of the three meetings that NACNEP held during the year were devoted to the study of the issues through presentations made by nursing organization representatives and experts reporting on relevant research. Members of NACNEP during those meetings worked on refining and prioritizing the recommendations in their broad action plan presented in the first mandated report. NACNEP recognized that solutions for the presently on-going nursing shortage rest within the use of already available nursing resources. Activities undertaken to newly develop additional resources will be effective in the future because of the time involved in attracting and educating students. During the meetings, the Council explored possible approaches that have been or may be taken to access those already educated as registered nurses. However, NACNEP, given its role as an advisory body, agreed that it was imperative to look for and recommend possible actions that could increase the capacity to produce more RNs and thus ward off future shortages.

Any actions that could be taken to alleviate the immediate shortfall in the RN supply are those pertaining to recruiting and retaining current RNs into the active workforce and enhancing the effective use of these current RNs. RNs who are working in non-nursing positions primarily point to better pay, more rewarding work and personal or family needs as the reasons for their not working in nursing. RNs who are not employed are considerably older, on the average, than employed RNs. Those inactive RNs who come from the younger segments of the population tend to have family responsibilities, often including the care of young children. The retention of already employed RNs in positions is of paramount importance as well. Maintaining the stability of the RN workforce is complex, associated with a variety of factors, both economic and non-economic. The solutions engage many segments both within and outside the health care delivery system including examining wage structures, schedules, support systems and the professional work environment.

Nurse Faculty Shortage

In the long term, however, the availability of an adequate and qualified RN workforce is dependent upon the education of sufficient numbers of new RNs as both replacements for those retiring and additions to satisfy the increasing demands. All projections of the future state of the adequacy of the RN supply show that the picture will only deteriorate given the aging of the RN workforce if the present rate of production of new RNs continues into the future. Therefore, the future of adequate nursing resources relies on the addition of substantial numbers of new RNs. Such an expansion cannot be accomplished without the availability of appropriate educational resources. Sufficient qualified faculty is a vital component of the educational resources needed. Nursing school administrators throughout the country point to vacant faculty positions and difficulties in recruiting. Even within the current climate of reduced numbers of applications for schools of nursing, the lack of faculty has caused a number of educational programs to limit admissions. An even greater shortage is anticipated for the future as substantial numbers of the current faculty members are expected to retire. A critical first step, then, in obtaining an adequate future supply of RNs, is to make certain that a cadre of qualified faculty will be available to teach them. This, then, becomes the first priority in alleviating the anticipated future nursing shortage. Thus, while mindful of the many critical issues facing patient care and nursing documented in its first mandated report, NACNEP focused this past year on the nurse faculty workforce shortage.

Future Activities

In its future activities NACNEP will continue to participate in ways of fostering interdisciplinary approaches to education and the delivery of health care. At the same time, continuing concerns about the availability of nursing resources lead to a special presentation in this report of NACNEP's most recent study of the nursing shortage and the underlying components of the nurse faculty shortage. With the nurse faculty shortage seen as the issue requiring immediate attention actions are recommended to improve the availability of sufficient qualified faculty critical to ensuring an appropriate future supply of RNs. In examining ways in which nursing can be most effective in delivering quality health care to the nation's population, NACNEP will continue to monitor the country's nurse supply for approaches to ensure its adequacy. NACNEP will also continue to examine the effect of Title VIII programs for their impact on ensuring a sufficient supply of RNs and enhancing nursing's contribution to the nation's health care.