RELEVANT EXCERPTS FROM
42 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (CFR), CHAPTER 1, PART 5, Appendix
B (October 1, 1993, pp. 34-48)
Criteria for Designation
of Areas Having Shortages of Dental Professionals
Part
I -- Geographic Areas
A. Criteria.
A geographic
area will be designated as having a dental professional shortage
if the following three criteria are met:
1. The area
is a rational area for the delivery of dental services.
2. One of the
following conditions prevails in the area:
(a) The area
has a population to full-time-equivalent dentist ratio of at least
5,000:1, or
(b) The area
has a population to full-time-equivalent dentist ratio of less than
5,000:1 but greater than 4,000:1 and has unusually high needs for
dental services or insufficient capacity of existing dental providers.
3. Dental professionals
in contiguous areas are overutilized, excessively distant, or inaccessible
to the population of the area under consideration.
B. Methodology.
In determining
whether an area meets the criteria established by paragraph A of
this part, the following methodology will be used:
1. Rational
Area for the Delivery of Dental Services.
(a) The following
areas will be considered rational areas for the delivery of dental
health services:
(i) A county,
or a group of several contiguous counties whose population centers
are within 40 minutes travel time of each other.
(ii) A portion
of a county (or an area made up of portions of more than one county)
whose population, because of topography, market or transportation
patterns, distinctive population characteristics, or other factors,
has limited access to contiguous area resources, as measured generally
by a travel time of greater than 40 minutes to such resources.
(iii) Established
neighborhoods and communities within metropolitan areas which display
a strong self-identity (as indicated by a homogenous socioeconomic
or demographic structure and/or a traditional of interaction or
intradependency), have limited interaction with contiguous areas,
and which, in general, have a minimum population of 20,000.
(b) The following
distances will be used as guidelines in determining distances corresponding
to 40 minutes travel time:
(i) Under normal
conditions with primary roads available: 25 miles.
(ii) In mountainous
terrain or in areas with only secondary roads available: 20 miles.
(iii) In flat
terrain or in areas connected by interstate highways: 30 miles.
Within inner
portions of metropolitan areas, information on the public transportation
system will be used to determine the distance corresponding to 40
minutes travel time.
2. Population
Count.
The population
count use will be the total permanent resident civilian population
of the area, excluding inmates of institutions, with the following
adjustments:
(a) Seasonal
residents, i.e., those who maintain a residence in the area but
inhabit it for only 2 to 8 months per year, may be included but
must be weighted in proportion to the fraction of the year they
are present in the area.
(b) Migratory
workers and their families may be included in an area's population
using the following formula: Effective migrant contribution to population
= (fraction of year migrants are present in area) x (average daily
number of migrants during portion of year that migrants are present).
3.
Counting of Dental Practitioners.
(a) All non-Federal
dentists providing patient care will be counted, except in those
areas where it is shown that specialists (those dentists not in
general practice or pedodontics) are serving a larger area and are
not addressing the general dental care needs of the area under consideration.
(b) Full-time
equivalent (FTE) figures will be used to reflect productivity differences
among dental practices based on the age of the dentists, the number
of auxiliaries employed, and the number of hours worked per week.
In general, the number of FTE dentists will be computed using weights
obtained from the matrix in Table 1, which is based on the productivity
of dentists at various ages, with different numbers of auxiliaries,
as compared with the average productivity of all dentists. For the
purposes of these determinations, an auxiliary is defined as any
non-dentist staff employed by the dentist to assist in operation
of the practice.
TABLE
1 - EQUIVALENCY WEIGHTS, BY AGE AND NUMBER OF AUXILIARIES
|

|
<55
|
55-59
|
60-64
|
65+
|
|
No auxiliaries
|
0.8
|
0.7
|
0.6
|
0.5
|
|
One auxiliary
|
1.0
|
0.9
|
0.8
|
0.7
|
|
Two auxiliaries
|
1.2
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
0.8
|
|
Three
auxiliaries
|
1.4
|
1.2
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
|
Four
auxiliaries
|
1.5
|
1.5
|
1.3
|
1.2
|
If information
on the number of auxiliaries employed by the dentist is not available,
Table 2 will be used to compute the number of full-time equivalent
dentists.
TABLE
2 - EQUIVALENCY WEIGHTS, BY AGE
|

|
<55
|
55-59
|
60-64
|
65+
|
|
Equivalency
Weights
|
1.2
|
0.9
|
0.8
|
0.6
|
The number
of FTE dentists within a particular age group (or age/auxiliary
group) will be obtained by multiplying the number of dentists within
that group by its corresponding equivalency weight. The total supply
of FTE dentists within an area is then computed as the sum of those
dentists within each age (or age/auxiliary) group.
(c) The equivalency
weights specified in tables 1 and 2 assume that dentists within
a particular group are working full-time (40 hours per week). Where
appropriate data are available, adjusted equivalency figures for
dentists who are semi-retired, who operate a reduced practice due
to infirmity or other limiting conditions, or who are available
to the population of an area only on a part-time basis will be used
to reflect the reduced availability of these dentists. In computing
these equivalency figures, every 4 hours (or 1/2 day) spent in the
dental practice will be counted as 0.1 FTE except that each dentist
working more than 40 hours a week will be counted as 1.0. The count
obtained for a particular age group of dentists will then be multiplied
by the appropriate equivalency weight from table 1 or 2 to obtain
a full-time equivalent figure for dentists within that particular
age orage/auxiliary category.
4. Determination
of Unusually High Needs for Dental Services.
An area will
be considered as having unusually high needs for dental services
if at least one of the following criteria is met:
(a) More than
20% of the population (or of all households) has incomes below the
poverty level.
(b) The majority
of the area's population does not have a fluoridated water supply.
5. Determination
of Insufficient Capacity of Existing Dental Care Providers.
An area's existing
dental care providers will be considered to have insufficient capacity
if at least two of the following criteria are met:
(a) More than
5,000 visits per year per FTE dentist serving the area.
(b) Unusually
long waits for appointments for routine dental services (i.e., more
than 6 weeks).
(c) A substantial
proportion (2/3 or more) of the area's dentists do not accept new
patients.
6. Contiguous
Area Considerations.
Dental professional(s)
in areas contiguous to an area being considered for designation
will be considered excessively distant, overutilized or inaccessible
to the population of the area under consideration if one of the
following conditions prevails in each contiguous area:
(a) Dental
professional(s) in the contiguous area are more than 40 minutes
travel time from the center of the area being considered for designation
(measured in accordance with Paragraph B.1.(b) of this part).
(b) Contiguous
area population-to-(FTE) dentist ratios are in excess of 3,000:1,
indicating that resources in contiguous areas cannot be expected
to help alleviate the shortage situation in the area being considered
for designation.
(c) Dental
professional(s) in the contiguous area are inaccessible to the population
of the area under consideration because of specified access barriers,
such as:
(i) Significant
differences between the demographic (or socioeconomic) characteristics
of the area under consideration and those of the contiguous area,
indicating that the population of the area under consideration may
be effectively isolated from nearby resources. Such isolation could
be indicated, for example, by an unusually high proportion of non-English-speaking
persons.
(ii) A lack
of economic access to contiguous area resources, particularly where
a very high proportion of the population of the area under consideration
is poor (i.e., where more than 20 percent of the population or of
the households have incomes below the poverty level) and Medicaid-covered
or public dental services are not available in the contiguous area.
Part
II -- Population Groups
A. Criteria.
1. In general,
specified population groups within particular geographic areas will
be designated as having a shortage of dental care professional(s)
if the following three criteria are met:
a. The area
in which they reside is rational for the delivery of dental care
services, as defined in paragraph B.1 of part I of this appendix.
b. Access barriers
prevent the population group from use of the area's dental providers.
c. The ratio
(R) of the number of persons in the population group to the number
of dentists practicing in the area and serving the population group
is at least 4,000:1.
2. Indians
and Alaska Natives will be considered for designation as having
shortages of dental professional(s) as follows:
(a) Groups
of members of Indian tribes (as defined in section 4(d) of Pub.
L. 94 - 437, the Indian Health Care Improvement Act of 1976) are
automatically designated.
(b) Other groups
of Indians or Alaska Natives (as defined in section 4(c) of Pub.
L. 94 - 437) will be designated if the general criteria in paragraph
1 are met.
Part
III -- Facilities
A. Federal
and State Correctional Institutions.
1. Criteria.
Medium to maximum
security Federal and State correctional institutions and youth detention
facilities will be designated as having a shortage of dental professional(s)
if both the following criteria are met:
(a) The institution
has at least 250 inmates.
(b) The ratio
of the number of internees per year to the number of FTE dentists
serving the institution is at least 1,500:1.
Here the number
of internees is defined as follows:
(i) If the
number of new inmates per year and the average length-of-stay (ALOS)
are not specified, or if the information provided does not indicate
that intake dental examinations are routinely performed by dentists
upon entry, then -- Number of internees = average number of inmates.
(ii) If the
ALOS is specified as one year or more, and intake dental examinations
are routinely performed upon entry, then -- Number of internees
= average number of inmates + number of new inmates per year.
(iii) If the
ALOS is specified as less than one year, and intake dental examinations
are routinely performed upon entry, then -- Number of internees
= average number of inmates + 1/3 x (1 + 2 x ALOS) x number of new
inmates per year where ALOS = average length-of-stay (in fraction
of year). (The number of FTE dentists is computed as in part I,
section B, paragraph 3 above.)
B. Public
or Non-Profit Private Dental Facilities.
1. Criteria.
Public or nonprofit
private facilties providing general dental care services will be
designated as having a shortage of dental professional(s) if both
of the following criteria are met:
(a) The facility
is providing general dental care services to an area or population
group designated as having a dental professional(s) shortage; and
(b) The facility
has insufficent capacity to meet the dental care needs of that area
or population group.
2. Methodology.
In determining
whether public or nonprofit private facilities meet the criteria
established by paragraph B.1. of this part, the following methodology
will be used:
(a) Provision
of Services to a Designated Area or Population Group.
A facility
will be considered to be providing services to an area or population
group if either:
(i) A majority
of the facility's dental care services are being provided to residents
of designated dental professional(s) shortage areas or to population
groups designated as having a shortage of dental professional(s);
or
(ii) The population
within a designated dental shortage area or population group has
reasonable access to dental services provided at the facility. Reasonable
access will be assumed if the population lies within 40 minutes
travel time of the facility and non-physical barriers (relating
to demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the population)
do not prevent the population from receiving care at the facility.
Migrant health
centers (as defined in section 319(a)(1) of the Act) which are located
in areas with designated migrant population groups and Indian Health
Service facilities are assumed to be meeting this requirement.
(b) Insufficient
Capacity To Meet Dental Care Needs.
A facility
will be considered to have insufficient capacity to meet the dental
care needs of a designated area or population group if either of
the following conditions exists at the facility.
(i) There are
more than 5,000 outpatient visits per year per FTE dentist on the
staff of the facility. (Here the number of FTE dentists is computed
as in part I, section B, paragraph 3 above.)
(ii) Waiting
time for appointments is more than 6 weeks for routine dental services.
[45 FR 76000,
Nov. 17, 1980, as amended at 54 FR 8738, Mar. 2, 1989; 57 FR 2480,
Jan. 22, 1992]
For
shortage designation inquiries, please call 1-888-275-4772. Press
option 1, then option 2 or contact the Shortage Designation
Branch:
sdb@hrsa.gov
301-594-0816
301-443-4370 fax
5600 Fishers Lane
Room 8C-26
Rockville, MD 20857
|